Search NCSBN
The search results displayed are from the entire site. Visit the Resources Section to focus your search and filter only resource items (publications, videos, papers, toolkits and other resources).
-
A_New_Framework_for_Practice_Academic_Partnerships.pdf
Zerwic and colleagues have developed general principles based on their experience in implementing such partner- ships in Iowa; educators may want to consider them when developing a new agreement with a clinical site.17 These principles are17: 1. Communicate frequently. In a fluid situa- tion like the COVID-19 pandemic, a regu- lar and established plan for communication was critical. 2. Establish priority for clinical resources.
-
A_Preferred_Future_for_Prelicensure_Program_Part2.pdf
The final step is a review of the process and the decision on accreditation status by the NLNAC Board of Commissioners. NLNAC has a candidacy process where all programs seeking initial accreditation must apply for candidacy. Candidacy is granted after a successful professional staff review of a program’s potential to meet NLNAC accreditation.
-
Building_a_Method_for_Writing_Clinical_Judgment_It.pdf
For example, in some situations you want to take a specific action to respond to a specific symptom, using a matching approach the item can be designed such that tokens A and B might be a tightly coupled pair that should be placed next to each other in the same row under two separate column headings.
-
NCSBN%20Examination%20Candidate%20Rules%20A4%20-%20French.pdf
Site: nclex.com
Tout incident de comportement non conforme présumé, y compris falsifier mes pièces d’identité ou les données de l’ordinateur, adopter un comportement nuisible (dont la divulgation du contenu de l’examen) sera signalé à Pearson VUE, au NCSBN et, s’il y a lieu, à mon organisme de réglementation. Mon examen pourra être invalidé si le NCSBN ou Pearson VUE déterminent que j’ai fait preuve d’un comportement non conforme. En outre, l’organisme de réglementation pourrait prendre d’autres sancti ...
-
CLEAR_fall2012.indd
CLEAR_fall2012.indd A Journal CLEAR Exam Review Volume XXIII, Number 2 Fall 2012 CLEAR Exam Review is a journal, published twice a year, reviewing issues affecting testing and credentialing. CER is published by the Council on Licensure, Enforcement, and Regulation, 403 Marquis Ave., Suite 200, Lexington, KY 40502.
-
Acceptable ID | NCLEX
Site: nclex.com
IDs presented for the NCLEX must be valid, government-issued, and include a first and last name in roman characters, a recent photo and a signature. Sanctioned (Embargoed) Country ID Due to U.S. trade restrictions, candidates living in a sanctioned country aren’t allowed to take the NCLEX. This is a federal requirement by The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) of the U.S. Department of Treasury. Candidates using a passport from a sanctioned country as identification must also present proof of residency (government issued identification) from a non-sanctioned country to take the NCLEX.
-
ORBS_Back_Office_QRG-Adding_or_Changing_a_Population_Focus.docx
ORBS Back Office Quick Reference Guide Adding a Certification and related Population Focus/Specialty Participant Version This is a quick reference guide (QRG) on adding a certification and related population focus/specialty in ORBS Back Office. Adding a Certification and Population Focus/Specialty Criteria for Adding a Certification and Population Focus/Specialty: 1.
-
DN_ND_09
A campus activity such as an infor- mation table in the student center, or a community activity such as an information table in a local bank, elementary school, senior center, or community hospital, offers great venues for students to interact with the public.
-
Spector_Woods_A_Collaborative_Model_for_approval_of_prelicensure_nursing_programs.pdf
Journal of Nursing Regulation, (2013) 47-52. doi:10.1016/S2155-8256(15)30186-1
-
Barnsteiner_Creating_a_fair_and_just_culture_in_schools_of_nursing.pdf
In part 1 of this series, we reported on findings from a study that examined how nurs- ing schools handled student errors and near misses. We found that few nursing schools had a policy or a reporting tool concerning these events; and that when policies did exist, the majority did not reflect the principles of a fair and just culture.